Historic


Areca Mill

About a year ago I posted a short blurb about an archaeology project I was working on that incorporated a SketchUp model. The model was not so much the focus, or even a requested, of the project, but the data and interest were there, so… I modeled.

Briefly, the this project entailed documenting a series of foundation walls that are eroding from the edges of the Valley Creek in front of General Washington’s Headquarters in Valley Forge National Historic Park, Pennsylvania. Unable to control the flooding of this flashy little stream, the National Park Service asked that the walls be documented and a small area excavated to determine the age of the walls. As the records indicate, there were a number of mills at this location. Two of them dated to the mid 1700’s and were standing when George Washington called this plot home during the brutal winter of 1776.

Areca Mill 3D model, Valley Forge, PA

To make a short story shorter, the archaeology was done, a nice foundation wall was exposed, and the eroding foundations were linked to the archaeology and historic maps. Construction methods and limited artifacts told us that the foundations eroding from the bank were more likely from the mid to late 1800’s and no the 1700’s. Finding a handful of late 1700’s artifacts underneath of the exposed foundation proved that it was older than the original mills. The conclusion: the foundation walls were part of the 1880’s Areca Paper mill. Built on and from the remnants of earlier buildings, this mill operated from 1880 to through the 1890’s. The entire complex was torn down in 1909 after the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania bought the property.In a super interesting twist, a comment received on the previous post of this models first generation, was from a gentlemen who had a family history tied to the mill! Paul Atkinson wrote:

“My Great grandfather worked at this mill in the late 1870 and 1880.MyAreca Mill 3D model in Landscape grandmother was born (1873) in a house just across the valley which her father bought after coming to the United States from England after the Civil War. Apparantly the mill went out of business late 1890.My grandmother tended cows on the very site of this mill. I recall seeing the foundation around 1940 or earlier when I very young. I was happy to see this historic reconstruction . The home my great grandfather bought in 1875 still stands and is a privite owned home . It was built in 1734..Seeing this gives me great pleasure. Also, knowing the fact my ggg grandfather served with Layfettye and George Washington at Valley Forge in 1777-1778. Paul Atkinson”

Areca Mill 3D model in landscapeUsing old documents and maps and the data we learned, I created a model of the Areca mill. (I <3 SketchUp!) Further establishing the historic visual context, I placed the mill model into photos of the landscape. This was a really fun part of the project (which was really my spare time, but people seemed to like it). Show is a recreation of an 1890’s photo.

During 2007 the ESRC, as part of the Historical Geographical Information
Systems Research Network, is sponsoring a number of free seminars on the
use of GIS to study the past. These will be led by Dr Ian Gregory, author
of A Place in History: A Guide to Using GIS in Historical Research.
Historical GIS is a rapidly growing field within historical research. A
Geographical Information System (GIS) is a form of database management
system within which every row of data is linked to a co-ordinate-based
location. By using GIS historians can structure, integrate, analyse and
visualise the geographies of the past.

The seminars will consist of a mixture of presentations and roundtable
discussions and will help attendees to make better use of GIS in their
research, by considering what exactly GIS has to offer historians, in what
ways historians make, or would like to make, use of GIS in their research
and what technological and methodological issues are faced. They are aimed
at a broad audience including established academics, members of the
heritage sector, junior researchers and post-graduates.

The first seminar will take place in York on 28 February 2007.  Places are
limited and booking forms need to be returned by 15 December 2006.
Further details of the seminar, including a downloadable booking form, can
be found at http://ahds.ac.uk/history/hgis/seminar-york.htm

Home is where the map is

As posted in the CCA Cartography blog, MapTech is now hosting a collection of late 19th century to early 20th century USGS quad maps for much of the Eastern United States. States covered by this project include everything from West Virginia to Maine. Each state is searchable by quad name, town name, or a graphical quad index. The quads (generally 15 minute or 1:63,360) are available as high resolution scans divided into NE,NW,SE,SW sections. Each section can be viewed online or downloaded (~0.5 to ~2.0 megs), although world files are not included.

The story behind this invaluable collection is is just as exciting as the collection itself. Begun by a railroad enthusiast, Christopher Marshall, mapping abandoned right-of-ways in New Hampshire, this collection has grown from a library to library search in his home area to a state by state collaboration. With a big help from Meredith Ricker of the University of New Hampshire Dimond Library Government Documents Department and other volunteer map enthusiasts, the collection has grew state by state into the massive project that it is now.

In order to make this collection publicly accessible to other map nuts and researchers,Historic Sensitivity Christopher approached MapTech through a common acquaintance and asked if they would host it. MapTech accepted and published them free of charge.

In my line of work, maps like this are extremely valuable. Time series studies of housing location, density, and land use as well as locations of long forgotten features such as houses, mines, and hydrologic features are all based of historic USGS quads. The creation of historic sensitivity analysis is done with maps such as this in conjunction with aerial photos. Also, prehistoric studies can benefit from these maps for their indication of what hydrologic systems and landforms may have looked like before urban sprawl and mass development.

Here (Finally!) is the technical - archaeological second part to a two-part story about the 1945 escape tunnel at the Eastern States Penitentiary. Please read Part I to hear the background of how this tunnel came to be.

The Archaeology of the 1945 Escape Tunnel

60 after the inmates were captured attempting to escape, the archaeological story starts. The task was to find the entrance and exit of the tunnel and then find out if the tunnel is still intact or has collapsed with age. The first phase was the excavation of the tunnel’s ends. With the aid of escape day photographs, it was relatively easy for the archaeologists to find the exact spot from which the prisoners escaped. Excavations were carried out, the backfilled escape hole was found, and a number of artifacts were recovered the dated to the period of the escape. Only a few feet of the exit hole were excavated. On the inside of the prison, in cell #68, heavy handed techniques were used to reopen the location where Kliney began his work. After the escape, the prison filled this cavity with large blocks of schist and concrete. The archaeologist’s excavation could only dent this barrier. With the ends of the tunnel found, it was now time to find the tunnel itself.

The first step in this process was to employ a Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) unit to non-invasivGround Penetratring Radarely probe the sediment below to look for signs of collapsed strata or a telltale void. Stating close to cell #68, the initial results gave the impression of a “V” shaped infilled trench under the courtyard. Possibly this could be part of the brick sewer or it could be the collapsed tunnel. Moving further towards the prison wall, the “V” shaped trench gave way to a very indistinct refraction signal which only showed the faintest shimmer of a hollow cavity. Due to the nature of the iron rich, intermittent sandy/clayey sand sediment below, the feedback from the GPR was diffuse. The locations of possible tunnel sightings were flagged and the survey was concluded, inconclusively.

With a 12” concrete saw, two 2’x2’ blocks of concrete were removed to expose to top of the soil. Closer to the cell, the first of two auger holes (4” diameter) was excavated. From contemporary reports, it was known that the tunnel should be about 10-12’ below the surface. With an auger hole 15’ below the surface and a continuous profile of fill, the hole was abandoned. Either this hole missed the mark or the tunnel was collapsed in this area.

The second auger hole, 10’ closer to the prison wall, was noticeably different form the start. The sediment being augured was much cleaner and sandier than previously, worked progressed quickly. At 8.5’ below the surface, the auger was set back into position to take another 10” deep sample when all of a sudden, “Thump”, the auger dropped. Falling nearly to the handle, the auger had found its mark.

Electric EelIn order to verify, and hopefully inspect, the tunnel, special video equipment was needed. The first attempt at seeing in the tunnel was done through the use of an “Electric Eel” sewer camera. This piece of equipment consists of a LED lit camera head on the end of a semi-rigid cord hooked into a small close caption display and VCR. The initial results were low quality, but stunning none-the-less. After 60 years, the tunnel from which 11 men tried to gain their freedom was seen again. As the camera was pushed through the soft sediment, only glimpses of the tunnel environment were seen. After some exploration, the camera, sprung by the tension of its own cord, flashed from darkness to the view that everyone had been waiting for; a clear picture of the wooden braces used for shoring. This “artifact” was one of the two key pieces to telling the tunnels story. Aside form the once rumored wooden supports was a description of an electrical lighting system used by the inmates. No evidence of this could be seen in the sewer cameras images.

The second attempt, some months later, to get a clear picture of the tunnel utilized much more advancedEnviroSight video equipment. Thanks to the very accommodating team from EnviroSight, the second phase of tunnel video was an unqualified success. Using two pieces of equipment, a video camera wielding robotic crawler and a high resolution zoom camera on the end of a pole, the inside of the tunnel came to life with highly detailed and very clear pictures.

The robotic crawler, aka Rovver, was lowered into the tunnel and proceeded to drive across the lumpy floor

of the tunnel to the location of the wooden shoring (see pictures at bottom of post). From this vantage, the Rovver’s self-lit camera beamed back crystal clear images of the wooden. In these images, the dangling electrical cord of the lightingRovver system was plainly visible. In total 4 sets of wooden shoring are visible and still standing in various stages of decay. After 60 years, the wooden braces fashioned from various scraps from the prison wood shop were still doing their job.

Images from the zoomable pole camera show that the tunnel beyond the shoring is collapse. As well, the images shown that the tunnel in the direction of the cell block was also collapse. The interpretation of GPR results and a good placement of the auger hole found the only open portion of the 1945 escape tunnel. And luckily, this portion was complete with standing wooden shoring and remnant electrical lighting wire.

At the end of the busy weekend, the crowds were gone, the equipment was pulled, and the auger hole into the tunnel was sealed. Re-discovered, explored, and documented, the Eastern State Penitentiary escape tunnel yielded more thrills and info than anyone had imagined. If you are ever in the Philadelphia area, I highly recommend you take a tour of this most historic prison.

Here is a link to a well done tutorial for creating 3D models of buildings using historic plans. This tutorial utilizes Inkscape for the vector data and Blender for 3D modeling. Both programs are available freely, for multiple platforms, under open source licenses and have active development communities.
This tutorial is created by Sanna Tammisto & Ari Häyrinen at 3D-Bridge. 3D-Bridge, “Transferring of Cultural Heritage with New Technology”) is a pan-European group the is established to foster heritage preservation through the melding of opensource technology with a mulitperspective architectural practices. As stated in the 3D-Bridge site, there objectves are:

  • The target of the 3D-Bridge project is to develop tools of new technology based on an open source policy for the research and preservation of cultural heritage.
  • The 3D-Bridge project will highlight the common European contents of regional cultural heritage research based on different geographic, ecological and cultural starting points.
  • The 3D-Bridge project will translate European cultural heritage into the language of future societies and media literate generationbels.

IF you are interested in this organizations like this, check out the recent post on IOSA.it, “Open Source Software and Open Standards in Archaeology”

*image property of 3D-Bridge

Thanks to Jonathan at the Map Room blog for pointing out this fabulous historic map resource. Old London Maps is a free repository of 16th to 20th century maps of London. The purpose of this collection is to offer access to scores of rare historic maps, engravings, and plans of Old London for use by historians, genealogists, and those who are simply curious.

Along with the fantastic map collection is over 500 pages of information and articles and a collection as many as 4000, when the uploading is complete, 19th and 20th century photos related to Old London.

*All linked photos/maps are the property of Sarah Douglas Enterprises Ltd 2006

A quick post from a current project. This is a SketchUp interpretation of a

historic structure from archaeological field data and historic records. Without going into too much detail, this is a quick image of a reconstructed 19th century paper mill that once stood in front of George Washington’s headquarters in Valley Forge, PA. While Washington was in tenure, the mill works included a Grist Mill and Saw Mill. In the 1840’s the Grist Mill burned and was rebuilt close to the original spot. Then in the 1860’s, the much larger paper mill was constructed, which encompassed the previous structures.The Model of Washington’s Headquarters is accurate to the modern standing reconstruction. Apparently, the building has been remodeled to its historic image at least three times.

Google Maps Link to Area

Google Earth Link to Area (sorry, no models)

The Story of the 1945 Escape Tunnel

On April 3rd, 1945, 12 men escaped from the Eastern State Pennitentary in Philadelphia. Among them, was the notorius bank robber, “Slick” Willie Sutton. Sutton, as well as the tunnels engineer, Clarence Klinedinst were caught very shortly after the escape. Within 2 days, all then men were back in the prison.

On April 1st, 2006, the tunnel was cleary seen again for the first time in 61 years.

Although, I am late to the game, since this story has been covered by ArchaeologyNews, the AP, NPR, and a slew of newspapers and blog, I figured I should tell my side of the story since it was my companies job to find it.

The story goes, prior to the escape, Clarence Klinedinst, being a mason, was tasked with replastering the walls of cell block 7 (SW arm in this live.com view). After completing this task, he bargained with the officials to give him his choice of cells, he chose cell #68. Incarcerated by him self, he began a project that would take him over a year to complete. Beginning with a specially placed thin plaster wall, which he created during his replastering duty, he began his dig to freedom.

Cell #68 is located at the distal end of cell block 7, with nothing but 100ft of courtyard, and a 30 foot wall between it and the outside. Clarence Klinedinst (aka Kliney), began to dig, at first by himself then later with a cell mate, into the wall and straight down to the sand sediment below. Once Kliney was into the wall and through the footer, there were no obstructions until he would encounter the 12 foot deep base of the prison wall.

Digging for close to a year and a half, Kliney and his cell mate alluded suspicion. Taking turns digging at night, one prisoner would sleep while the other dug. Paper Mache heads were constructed to fool the ever watchful guards. At first, the prisoners disposed of the rock and soil in the cell toilet and in the yard. After a number of feet was dug from the tunnel, a brick sewer pipe was encountered and used to discard the dirt.

The tunnel was well planned and equipped with an electrical lighting system and wooden bracing to help keep its integrity. Heading level across the yard, the tunnel was dug to the base of the outer wall and then dug down ~5 feet to get below the walls footing. At this point, the tunnel was excavated through the water table of an old stream that used to flow across the area, before it received 15 feet of fill to level the prison yard.

This stream was part of the escape undoing. On the morning of April 3rd, Kliney, his cell mate, Slick Willey, and 9 other opportunists made a mad dash through the tunnel and out the tiny exit hole on the corner of 22nd and Fairmount. With clothes wet and muddied from crawling though the water filled depression under the wall, the police had little difficulty following the tracks and capturing the crooks. All were hauled back to jail, and one of America’s greatest escape stories was born.

In the second part of this post, I’ll go over the technology and archaeology that were used to find the tunnel… stay tuned (see more photos at my Flickr page)

Cover this morning at The Map Room blog, the Minnesota Historical Society has scanned and made available a large collection of historic maps ranging from 1848 to 1907. The online collection is drawn from the society’s archive of 19,000 maps and 2000 atlas volumes. The main archive contains map dating back to 1581.

The online version of this amazing catalog contains plat maps and atlases created by the General Land Office and the Bureau for Land Management. The plat collection is searchable by county or township/range. The scanned atlas editions include a statewide coverage, as well as, Dakota, Hennepin, Ramsey, and Winona Counties.

I am not sure how recent the addition of the online map resources is, but I thought it may be useful to the handful of Minnesota readers.